Our position

Our Independence

What it means that we build tools — and nothing more. This page explains the boundaries of our role and why those boundaries matter.

The short version: Loxnuke designs and implements tracking systems. We do not manage funds, hold money, advise on investments, or participate in group decisions. Our work is entirely at the level of records and documentation tools.

No fund management

We never receive, hold, transfer, or instruct the movement of any money belonging to the group. All financial transactions — contributions, withdrawals, distributions — take place directly between group members through their own banking or transfer channels. Our involvement begins and ends with the documentation of those transactions in the tracking system.

No custody of funds

We do not hold or safeguard group funds at any point. We have no access to group bank accounts, wallets, or any financial instrument holding the investment capital. The tracking system we build records what has happened — it does not control or influence what happens.

No participation in decisions

We do not advise on investment decisions, project selection, timing, or any other aspect of the group's financial strategy. We do not attend group meetings in a decision-making capacity, and we do not have a vote or influence over how the group allocates its capital. Our role is to provide clear records — what participants do with that information is entirely their own affair.

No legal or financial advice

Nothing we produce — spreadsheets, dashboards, reconciliation reports, or written guides — constitutes legal, financial, accounting, or investment advice. The tracking system is an organizational tool. Groups should consult qualified professionals for legal structuring, tax obligations, and financial planning related to their investment.

What we do provide

We design, build, and configure tracking infrastructure. We train the administrator who will use it. We conduct a quarterly review to ensure the system is functioning correctly. We answer questions about how to use the system. Everything we do is in service of giving the group clear, organized, auditable records of its own contributions and participation percentages.

Why this matters to the group

A tracking service that also manages funds creates conflicts of interest that can damage trust within the group. By maintaining a strict boundary between record-keeping and financial management, we ensure that the system serves the group's transparency needs without introducing any additional risk or dependency. The group remains in complete control of its money and decisions at all times.

Practical implications

What this looks like in practice

No. We have no access to any bank accounts, payment platforms, or financial instruments belonging to the group or its members. We receive information about contributions from the administrator, who enters it into the tracking system. We never interact directly with financial accounts.
No. Investment decisions — which projects to fund, how much to commit, when to enter or exit — are entirely the group's own decisions. We build tools that help the group track what it has already decided to do. We do not provide investment recommendations or financial advice of any kind.
Our role is to provide accurate records that the group can use to resolve disputes among themselves. We can verify what the system shows — contribution amounts, dates, percentages — but we do not mediate disputes, adjudicate claims, or take sides. Disputes about the underlying investment or group governance are outside our scope entirely.
No. The tracking system is an organizational and documentation tool — comparable to a structured filing system or a project management spreadsheet. It records information that the group provides. It does not hold, move, or generate money. It does not constitute a financial service, investment vehicle, or regulated product.
The group administrator is responsible for entering accurate information into the system. We build a system that makes accurate entry straightforward and provides clear structure for doing so. We also conduct a quarterly review to identify any systematic issues. However, the accuracy of individual entries depends on the information provided by the group itself.